WASHINGTON — On Wednesday, July 15th, 2026, House Democrats were sharply divided over a proposed amendment to end U.S. aid to Israel, exposing a rare split between the party’s top leaders. The amendment, introduced by Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.), aimed to cut off assistance to Israel but was ultimately rejected in a 104-314 vote. Notably, 103 Democrats joined Massie in supporting the measure, while 98 Democrats sided with Republicans in opposing it.

House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.) voted against the amendment, describing it as “overly broad.” Meanwhile, Progressive Caucus Chair Greg Casar (D-Texas) advocated for a “yes” vote, urging the Democratic Party to adopt a new approach to Israel and Palestine.

The vote highlighted tensions between a growing progressive faction seeking to halt aid until Israel changes its Gaza policies and more centrist Democrats who favor maintaining the longstanding U.S.-Israel alliance. One Democrat supporting the amendment stated, “I will be voting yes, not because I agree with the entirety of the amendment, or the GOP’s cynical motivations for its consideration, but because I believe we must change course. While Democratic Members will make different decisions on this amendment in good faith, we are absolutely united in our shared goal of permanent peace.”

Ami Bera (D-Calif.), a member of the Foreign Affairs and Intelligence committees, voted "present," expressing support for the U.S.-Israel relationship but criticizing the Netanyahu government’s conduct in Gaza, Lebanon, and the West Bank, as well as its role in escalating tensions with Iran.

This intraparty conflict comes amid shifting public opinion. In February 2026, for the first time, more Americans expressed sympathy for Palestinians (41%) than Israelis (36%), signaling changing attitudes that may be influencing lawmakers’ positions.

Sources